
The one-star reviews of Harry Potter books published in the last three years are not reviews of the books. They are responses to a public figure who wrote the books. Separating those two things is increasingly difficult.
The books themselves hold up in the ways they always did: the plotting is meticulous, the world-building has internal consistency that rewards rereading, and the emotional beats land. The criticism of the work as work is a different conversation from the criticism of the author. Both conversations deserve to be had clearly.